Blogs

AI eats services

We’ve heard “AI will eat software.” The bigger story:AI is going to eat services.

By “services,” I mean asset-light, information-driven businesses whose core moat is business process logic embedded in software — underwriting, booking, logistics coordination, CRM, claims processing.

AI Eats Information Work — and Services Are Information Work.

My thesis is that AI will eat the legacy services companies—insurance (health, auto, property, life), CRM, e-Commerce, travel & leisure, banking, brokerage, legal, real estate and a lot of others.

Why? Because at the core of these services companies, there are business processes that were codified in software over the past decades. And now GenAI can enable startups to spin up service businesses that codify in software the entire redesigned AI-centric business with all its business processes, and do it at low cost and do it rapidly.

While the incumbent service business spend time using GenAI for automating one workflow at a time, startups can rebuild entire service businesses from scratch using GenAI.


Legacy Services vs Clean-Slate AI

1. Legacy systems at incumbent service businesses are not moats. They’re anchors.

Architectural Rigidity. Old software. Siloed data. Manual integrations. Multi-year vendor contracts.

These are not competitive advantages — they are drag.

A small team of sharp business process engineers who understand underwriting, logistics, claims, travel booking, CRM, etc. can now use GenAI to spin up:

 

  • AI-centric business processes
  • Clean data pipelines
  • Agent-based workflows
  • Entire operational platforms

 

In months. Not years.

2. Incumbents’ cost structures are anchored to maintenance.

Just keeping legacy systems alive consumes enormous operating budgets.

Now imagine:

A new GenAI built entire operational platform that costs roughly what incumbents already spend on maintenance — but delivers better service with a fraction of the labor.

That’s not incremental improvement. That’s economic displacement.

Incumbents aren't just paying for software; they are paying a complexity tax. When a health insurer spends $100M on maintenance, they are paying to keep thousands of brittle, manual integrations from breaking. An AI-native competitor doesn't 'maintain' integrations; it builds the entire service using redesigned AI-centric processes. This shifts the cost structure from Labor-plus-Legacy to Compute-plus-Logic, effectively reducing the cost of service by 90%.

3. Customers and partners aren’t sticky. They’re captive by friction.

Bookstores were “sticky.” Travel agencies were “sticky.” Brick-and-mortar insurance agents were “sticky.”

Until Amazon. Until Booking.com. Until online comparison engines.

History teaches a simple lesson: Customers aren’t loyal to process complexity. They’re trapped by it. Remove the friction — the “stick” disappears.

4. Can AI-generated software displace 20 years of legacy systems?

Yes.

The core moat of most service companies isn’t brand. It isn’t distribution.

It’s encoded business process logic sitting in legacy systems.

Mainframe actuarial code. Claims rules engines. Freight pricing tables. CRM workflow automation.

For decades, rewriting these systems was nearly impossible. With GenAI? That assumption is breaking.

Anthropic and Palantir focus on automating slices of business processes. But startups are beginning to think bigger: Not “automate a function.” Build a new AI-native service company.

5. Can incumbents pivot and rebuild themselves?

The probability is extremely low.

Rewriting core systems means:

 

  • Re-engineering processes
  • Challenging entrenched internal stakeholders
  • Accepting short-term margin compression

 

Large organizations struggle to do this. They pilot GenAI for a few use cases. While startups design entirely new operating models.


Let’s Talk Specifics

Insurance

Can GenAI write systems for:

 

  • Actuarial pricing
  • Underwriting
  • Claims processing
  • Fraud detection
  • Onboarding
  • Customer service

 

Yes.

And not as disconnected tools — but as a unified AI-centric platform. Startups can build workflows incumbents would love to have — but can’t justify rebuilding.

Travel Booking

AI agents can:

 

  • Optimize itineraries
  • Price dynamically
  • Personalize recommendations
  • Handle service issues

 

All in a single conversational interface. What once required teams, patches, and millions of lines of code can now be redesigned cleanly from scratch.

Logistics & Supply Chain

Today’s systems are buried under:

 

  • Thousands of relational tables
  • NoSQL layers
  • Data lakes
  • Hundreds of APIs

 

GenAI enables something different: Re-architect the entire business around AI-centric decisioning — not bolt AI onto legacy databases.

CRM & Customer Service

AI already replaces routine contact center workflows.

But take it further: Can GenAI help create a new Salesforce or ServiceNow in 6–12 months at a fraction of current operating costs?

Not unimaginable.

Five smart engineers and $10 to 50M in VC funding can now challenge what once required billions.


Are We There Yet?

Not yet. But the constraints that protected incumbents are dissolving.

For the incumbents, the track you are on is not safe, the GenAI locomotive is coming.


Last Week’s Market Tremors Weren’t Irrational

The recent sell-off in service companies wasn’t random volatility.

Investors are starting to ask: What happens when AI doesn’t just assist services — but builds the entire service platform from scratch? Which moats survive that? Which don’t?


Conclusion: The New Frontier for Builders

The era of "AI-as-a-feature" is coming to a close, and the era of AI-native services is beginning. For decades, the "moat" of a service company was its encoded business process logic—hundreds of thousands of lines of code buried in legacy systems. Today, those systems have turned into anchors, dragging down incumbents with massive maintenance costs and siloed data.

While established giants spend years trying to automate a single workflow, the path is clear for a new breed of entrepreneur.

The Opportunity for "Sharp Engineers"

The next wave of disruption will not look like the SaaS revolution; it will look like the total economic displacement of legacy service providers. If you are a business process engineer who understands the intricacies of underwriting, logistics, or claims processing, you now hold the keys to the kingdom.

·       Speed to Market: You can now spin up entire operational platforms in months, not years.

·       Cost Advantage: You can run a service business at 10% of the operating cost of a legacy incumbent.

·       Clean-Slate Design: You aren't "bolting on" AI; you are re-architecting the entire coordination layer around AI-centric decisioning.

A Call to Action

Startups are no longer limited to "automating a function". You have the tools to build a new Salesforce, a new UnitedHealth, or a new Booking.com from scratch with a fraction of the labor and a fraction of the capital.

"Incumbents are shackled by what they built. Startups are not."

If you are building an AI-native company designed to displace an entire service business, the world is waiting for your operating model. Don't just improve the process—replace it.

Sustainable AI Data Centers

Sustainability Design Principles and Performance Targets for AI Data Center

The explosion of large language model (LLM)–based artificial intelligence has created an unprecedented surge in the demand for compute infrastructure, leading to the rapid development of giga-watt-scale AI data centers. As part of IWE’s ongoing assignment, sustainability has been established as a foundational pillar of design—ensuring that the environmental footprint of these facilities remains as low as possible even as their computational footprint grows exponentially.

The following sustainability design principles guide all design and procurement decisions:

  1. Minimize the carbon footprint of electricity generation used to power the data center

    • Target: Achieve an annualized carbon intensity of ≤ 50 g CO₂e/kWh, through a mix of renewable power purchase agreements (PPAs), on-site solar + battery energy storage systems (BESS), and participation in 24×7 carbon-free energy matching programs.

    • Metric: Annual Scope 2 emissions (tCO₂e), measured as the weighted average of hourly energy consumption × marginal grid emission factor.

  2. Energy-efficient cooling with heat recovery

    • Target: Achieve Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE) ≤ 1.15 for GPU-dense AI halls (> 80 kW/rack), with Cooling System Effectiveness (CSE) > 0.85.

    • Metric: Fraction of waste heat recovered for reuse in district heating or absorption chilling ≥ 25%.

  3. Deploy demand response to minimize grid stress during peak hours

    • Target: Design facility load flexibility of ≥ 10% curtailable capacity (e.g., temporary throttling of non-critical training jobs, shifting inference to off-peak hours).

    • Metric: Annual hours of grid demand response participation; MW curtailed per event.

  4. Minimize use of high-GHG refrigerants and chemicals

    • Target: Eliminate refrigerants with Global Warming Potential (GWP) > 10; preference for low-GWP refrigerants such as R-1234ze(E) or CO₂ (R-744).

    • Metric: Total refrigerant charge (kg) × GWP < 100 tCO₂e equivalent per data hall.

  5. Minimize water consumption

    • Target: Achieve Water Usage Effectiveness (WUE) ≤ 0.10 L/kWh through air-cooled or liquid-cooled closed-loop systems, avoiding evaporative towers.

    • Metric: Annual water draw per MWh of IT load.

 

IWE has developed a Design Decision Framework linking each principle to engineering measures—like use of direct-to-chip liquid cooling, chilled-water recovery loops, renewable PPAs, and grid-interactive controls.

Long duration energy storage

This blog will list what grids planning in terms of energy storage systems to increase the penetration of renewable energy--wind and solar power.

INDIA

Details of the CEA advisory

"To facilitate the large-scale integration of renewable energy, the CEA has recommended that renewable energy implementing agencies and state utilities include co-located ESSs in upcoming solar tenders.

The advisory specifies that storage capacity equivalent to 10 percent of the installed solar project capacity, with a minimum duration of two hours, should be mandated. Further, the tender documents should include a clear compliance mechanism to ensure the availability of stored energy during non-solar hours.

This approach is expected to improve grid reliability during peak demand periods while also optimising the utilisation of renewable energy sources. Additionally, distribution licensees could consider requiring rooftop solar installations to include a minimum of two-hour energy storage. This would not only enhance supply reliability for consumers but also reduce the burden on distribution networks by curbing excess power injection during peak solar generation hours.

ESSs can operate in two distinct modes. In single-cycle operation, they can charge exclusively from the co-located solar power plant and discharge during evening hours. In double-cycle operation, they can charge from both the co-located solar plant and the grid during periods of low demand, allowing for discharge during peak hours when solar generation is unavailable."

https://powerline.net.in/2025/03/06/enhancing-grid-stability-ceas-adviso...

------------------

Energetica Article:

As per the National Electricity Plan published by the Central Electricity Authority, in order to integrate the 364 GW of solar and 121 GW of wind capacity by 2031-32, India would require 73.93 GW/411.4 GWh of storage capacity - 26.69 GW/175.18 GWh from Pumped Storage Projects (PSP) and 47.24 GW/236.22 GWh from Battery Energy Storage System (BESS).

The current installed capacity of ESS as of December 31, 2024 is 4.86 GW which includes 4.75 GW of PSP and 0.11 GW of BESS projects.

Read more at: https://energetica-india.net/news/ministry-of-power-advises-reias-to-inc...

 

 

Energy Related GHG Emissions as of end of 2023

The following statistics were collected in early 2024 for Global energy-related (not just electricity) CO2 emissions:

  1. In 2023 the total emissions were 37.4 billion tons
  2. It increased in 2023 by 410 million tons (1.1% rise).  In 2022 the increase was 490 million tons.
  3. 40% of the rise in 2023 can be attributed to an exceptional shortfall in hydropower due to extreme droughts in China, the US, and several other economies

Source: https://www.energyglobal.com/special-reports/04032024/growth-of-clean-en...

 

  1. In 2023, 30% of electricity came from RE, globally
  2. GHG emissions from fossil-fuel likely peaked in 2023, in the future it should decline.  In 2024 generation from fossil-fuels is expected to decline by 2%.
  3. US gets 23% of electricity from RE
  4. IEA is forecasting that global demand for coal, gas, and oil will peak this decade (for all energy use, not just electricity). It also projected that renewables would make up nearly 50 percent of the world’s electricity mix by 2030.

Source: https://www.theverge.com/2024/5/7/24151375/renewable-energy-global-elect...

Wind energy statistics 2023-24

Offshore wind statistics, as of the end of 2024

https://www.offshorewind.biz/2025/05/02/offshore-wind-grows-by-11-gw-in-...

Total global offshore wind capacity: 78.5 GW

--x--

 

Cost of LDES

https://www.utilitydive.com/news/thermal-and-compressed-air-storage-chea...

https://www.pnnl.gov/projects/esgc-cost-performance/download-reports 

 

US 3Q of 2024

  1. In third quarter of 2024, US added 10.2 GW of utility-scale solar, wind and energy storage projects
  2. In third quarter of 2024 in US, solar capacity accounted for 6.3 GW, and storage was 3.5 GW, and wind was 396 MW
  3. 2024 has been a record year, with year-to-date installations reaching 29.6 GW, an 86% increase compared to the same period in 2023.
  4. At the end of September, the US had 294 GW of clean power capacity in operation
  5. Texas has the largest fleet -- 74.3 GW. California is second with 38.7 GW. Five states have more than 10 GW of clean power in operation and 16 states have more than 5 GW installed.
  6. Clean power project pipeline is 170 GW at the end of September, an 18% increase year-over-year. Within this, the onshore wind pipeline expanded by 3% from the second quarter to reach 24.4 GW

Source: https://renewablesnow.com/news/us-adds-10-2-gw-of-clean-energy-capacity-...

Global offshore wind power future projection (as of early 2024): https://www.visualcapitalist.com/sp/visualized-offshore-wind-installatio...

US 1Q of 2024

  1. Solar installations in US have surpassed 100 GW.  it took 18 years to get to 50 GW, and 4 years for it to double the capacity.  4.5 GW of solar capacity was added in 1Q 2024
  2. 132 MW Offshore wind project in South Fork started generation.  This is a wind farm off the coast of NY with 12 SG-11 GW wind turbines
  3. The pipeline for clean energy projects is 175 GW out of which 31.6 GW is the pipeline for BESS, and 13.7 GW of onshore wind.

Source: https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/us-adds-56gw-of-utility-scale...

India 1Q of 2024

  1. Solar installations in India are at 82.64 GW, with 9.5 GW addition in 1Q of 2024.
  2. Indian government has a target of 50 GW annual auctions of RE until 2028

Source: https://www.energetica-india.net/news/indias-solar-revolution-q1-2024-se...

The following statistics were collected in early 2024:

Global battery energy storage installations: https://www.motive-power.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/battcap.png 

Installed Capacity

  1. Total wind power capacity worldwide as of the end of 2023: 1,021 GW or 1 TW
  2. Total wind power capacity worldwide at the end of 2022: 906 GW
  3. Total wind+solar power capacity in USA at the end of 2023: 262 GW
  4. Total wind power capacity in USA at the end of 2022: 144 GW
  5. Total energy storage capacity worldwide as of the end of 2022 (all types including pumped hydro): 174 GW
  6. Total BESS capacity worldwide was of the end of 2023: 
  7. Total energy storage capacity in USA at the end of 2023: 15.5 GW
  8. China's cumulative energy storage capacity reached 34.5 GW/74.5 GWh by the end of 2023 (https://www.pv-magazine.com/2024/01/12/chinese-pv-industry-brief-station...)

 

New Capacity Addition

  1. Global capacity additions of wind and solar PV in 2023: 510 GW (IEA, https://www.iea.org/reports/renewables-2023/executive-summary)
  2. 75% of VRE capacity addition in 2023 was solar PV 
  3. Wind power capacity addition worldwide in 2023: 117 GW, which includes 11 GW of offshore wind.  77% of new additions were in China.
  4. Wind power capacity addition worldwide in 2022: 77 GW
  5. Wind power capacity addition in USA in 2022: 8.5 GW
  6. Total wind+solar power capacity in USA addition in 2023 is: 33.8 GW
  7. In Energy terms, the percentage of wind and solar energy worldwide is about: 12.2%
  8. In Energy terms, the percentage of wind and solar energy in US is about: 14%
  9. China added 21.5 GW/46.6 GWh of new energy storage installations in 2023, up 194% year on year (https://www.pv-magazine.com/2024/01/12/chinese-pv-industry-brief-station...)
  10. Tesla added grid-connected BESS in 2023 of 14.7 GWh (https://www.energy-storage.news/tesla-deployed-14-7gwh-of-energy-storage...)

 

Sources: https://www.eenews.net/articles/us-sets-clean-power-installation-record-..., and others.

 https://www.powermag.com/group-says-record-117-gw-of-new-wind-power-gene...

 

Low prices of Rs 2.64 in October 2017 wind auction in India

In the latest 1,000 MW wind auction conducted by the Solar Energy Corporation of India (SECI), the lowest bids were Rs 2.64 (USD 0.0404) per kWh by ReNew for 250 MW and Orange for 200 MW.  To round out the winner, there were three other winners at Rs 2.65.  Compare this to the lowest auction price of Rs 3.42 (USD 0.0523) in August 2017 during wind auction by Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Company.

At USD 0.0404, the price of wind in India is approaching prices in the Texas region of US, where PPAs are below USD 0.02 (add to this USD 0.023 in production tax credits for 10 years).  Note, the wind speeds in India are lower than Texas, while the total installed cost in India is lower.

For details, see http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/energy/power/renew-power-or....

This article also points out that the lowest solar auction in India has yielded an astonishing Rs 2.44 per kWh (USD 0.03733).

With this race to the bottom in RE prices, lot of players in India are questioning if the utility-scale RE industry will get decimated.  Similar questions were being raised about the US wind industry 3 to 4 years ago when PPA prices in Texas dipped below US 0.02, and so far the industry has survived.

Cost of Solar PV + Storage in Kauai, Hawaii

In Kauai island of Hawaii, AES is installing 28 MW of solar PV with 20 MW/100 MWh of battery for $0.11/kWh.  In 2015, 13 MW solar PV with 52 MWh battery from SolarCity was signed for $0.145/kWh.  With significant storage, this was billed the "first fully dispatchable solar plant."

Currently the island is powered by diesel and the generation cost is 0.15+ per kWh.  The average residential tariff is $0.323/kWh.  And no discussion is complete without the beautiful duck curve:

If KIUC could move some of it solar generation to later hours, it could decrease its reliance on dirty fuel oil, prevent solar curtailment at midday, and save customers money.  
 
 
 

PV Plants Providing Frequency Response Services

We have always wondered if RE plants can provide frequency and voltage support to the grid,  First Solar is making the case:

"First Solar slightly curtailed power output at a 300-megawatt solar farm in California, enabled its array of inverters, and plugged into CAISO’s system. It then orchestrated the plant’s output to follow CAISO’s automatic generation control (AGC) signals, respond to its frequency regulation commands, and use inverters for voltage regulation, power factor regulation and reactive power control."

For more details see https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/PV-Plants-Can-Rival-Frequen...